Schneider Electric: AI+Power

An agentic factory platform that pairs PowerGPT with busbar topology monitoring, risk insight, and embodied inspection workflows for industrial operations.

Back
Schneider Electric AI+Power agent homepage

Overview

  • Role

    AI Product Design Intern (Digital Innovation department)

  • Timeline

    May 2026 - June 2026

  • Company

    Schneider Electric

  • Tools

    Cursor (Claude Opus 4.8, Fable 5), Figma

Context & problem

As the sole designer and AI product intern on this project, I was responsible for building a platform prototype from scratch: an integrated system pairing automated inspection with robot dispatch across the company's factories. A public demo date was set before the product existed, so my role centered on building out the frontend as the clearest way to make the product intent legible.

Almost all of my input was verbal, drawn from interviewing engineers, R&D colleagues, and on-duty factory workers, and from working directly alongside the team lead. Translating that unstructured domain expertise into a design driven by a product mindset was the key task. The problems identified were as follows:

  • Maintenance should be preventive, not reactive

    Factory inspection runs on fixed intervals and human judgment, so early signs of degradation are easy to miss until they become failures.

  • Domain knowledge is scattered

    Maintenance expertise sits in separate documents and in individual engineers' heads, never consolidated into structured, shared knowledge. Because none of it is a reusable asset, root cause diagnosis stays dependent on a few experienced people and cannot scale as equipment and data grow.

  • Readily available field response is crucial

    Inspection tasks like photo capture, thermal measurement, and status confirmation all require staff on site, yet faults can occur at any hour. The gap between detecting a problem and reaching it is bounded by travel time, and it widens exactly when conditions are most hazardous.

Process & iteration

With no UI design or product spec in place, I tried out a highly iterative, AI-native process in Cursor, testing different models against each other as their capabilities kept shifting. Building directly in code meant the prototypes were interactive and largely self-explanatory, which made cycling through feedback and revision fast.

Busbar topology graph with factory health score and a docked risk insight bar

My first iteration took a dashboard mindset: the factory as a network of nodes featuring different types of equipment. The topology is legible at a glance, while clicking on a node to inspect it or talking to the agent below offers more information on the equipment's status.

PowerGPT panel with a risk recommendation, batch dispatch control, and task execution log

In a second iteration, I added a task queue, giving real-time visual confirmation and history for the tasks the agent carries out as it multitasks, and docked the chat as a persistent panel instead of click-to-open to keep the agent's updates always in view.

Topology view with a toggle between device nodes and fault factors, alongside a paginated task log

I added a knowledge graph view over the node map, documenting the potential causes of equipment failure. I chose a top-down tree to illustrate cause and effect relationships. Agent messages can render as clickable components, such as a checklist that updates itself.

Real-time telemetry gauges beside a root-cause analysis with a confidence score

I implemented the equipment node tree in radial distribution to optimize space. Raw telemetry and the model's confidence now printed in the message dock, so a recommendation can be traced back to the readings behind it.

Task panel home screen with task management cards, a weekly schedule, status counters, and the agent chat

A major pivot came when me and my leader decided that a task-first interface was the right structure (as opposed to graph-first or chat-first), since the agent should be able to schedule tasks rather than only run them one-off or execute them immediately. The user gets an at-a-glance view of completed and upcoming tasks, and can update them efficiently.

Full Walkthrough

Flow 1: Creating an agent

Flow 2: Scheduling and running an inspection task

Flow 3: Encountering a triggered alert

Scenario picker for creating a maintenance agent: predictive maintenance, daily operations, or alarm convergence
Task panel home with schedule, status counters, task records, and the PowerGPT agent chat
Knowledge graph view of busbar fault factors beside the agent dialogue and alert records
3D factory simulation with robot call controls, highlighted cabinets, and short-circuit precursor diagnosis in chat

Outcome & impact

AI + Power was presented across nine demos at Schneider Electric's Beijing innovation campus to an audience of more than 500, including national leadership from Schneider's China teams and representatives from partner firms. During the demo, the system was wired directly to factory equipment on the exhibition floor, where it detected a fault, raised an alert, and dispatched a robot to shut the machine down in real time. The project was later shown at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai.

The platform has since entered formal development; as a result, my internship was extended from three months into a full year, where I work alongside engineers and product designers to carry the prototype to production.

Group watching a live demo of the digital ecosystem and robotic inspection setup

Live demo at Schneider Beijing Campus, June 24th

AI + Power showcased at the WAIC conference in Shanghai

WAIC conference, Shanghai, July 17th